Re: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Magpayo wrote:

> Here's the entire output:
> 
> major minor  #blocks  name
> 
>    3     0     512000 hda
>    3     1     511528 hda1
>  152     0 9523468862 etherd/e1.0
>  152    16 9523468862 etherd/e0.0
>  254     0 19046932480 dm-0
> 
> 
> I believe dm-0 is the lvm device.


Yep, in 1k units, so:

19046932480*1024
19504058859520

and:

superblock read failed, offset 19504058859520, size 2048, ag 64, rval 0

so it's trying to read a 2k (?) superblock right in the last 1k of the
device?  Hrm.  (Dave, Barry - isn't that 2048 the sector size, not block
size?)

Also from your sb 0 printout:

blocksize = 4096
dblocks = 11904332800

is 48760147148800, exactly 2.5x bigger than your device is. Weird.

-Eric