| To: | Gopala Krishna <gopalakrishna.n.m@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:55:53 -0800 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <d711080c0801140414n48e47140y88f545eba605eff9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <d711080c0801140414n48e47140y88f545eba605eff9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 05:44:22PM +0530, Gopala Krishna wrote: > Is there any problem with XFS fsync? Why dimode is getting updated > only during unmount? why not when I call fsync? Because fsync says > it has to flush all meta dat to disk before existing. it's probably in the log if you must poke about under the fs like this, try doing freeze/unfreeze (this is what i suggested to the grub people years ago, but i'm not sure it ever made it upstream) |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] fix XFSQA #184 for multiple invocations, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | binary NULL errors, Christoph Anton Mitterer |
| Previous by Thread: | ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |