xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] Prevent AIL lock contention during transaction completion

To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] Prevent AIL lock contention during transaction completion
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:42:35 +1100
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <479986F5.7070800@sgi.com>
References: <20080121052330.GG155259@sgi.com> <4796E8C8.3030702@sgi.com> <20080123073446.GU155259@sgi.com> <479986F5.7070800@sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 05:51:33PM +1100, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> So do we really need to call xlog_assign_tail_lsn() then?
> Or are we just being conservative in case we missed something?

Conservative - the last thing I want is to introduce a subtle
difference to the tail lsn in the log record because we didn't
update it immediately before writing it to disk. I think we are
probably safe removing it, but lets leave that until we got some
wider test coverage on this change first....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>