| To: | Mark Magpayo <mmagpayo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:10:42 -0600 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F02535951@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> |
| References: | <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F0253594C@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> <20080117030111.GH155259@sgi.com> <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F02535951@pvn-3001.purevideo.local> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) |
Mark Magpayo wrote: > Someone else asked for the size of the block devices... here's the > output from /proc/partitions: > > 152 0 9523468862 etherd/e1.0 > 152 16 9523468862 etherd/e0.0 are those two assembled into your actual block device? They look each about 8T. Is the lvm device also in /proc/partitions? -Eric |
| Previous by Date: | RE: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?, Mark Magpayo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?, Mark Magpayo |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?, Mark Magpayo |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?, Mark Magpayo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |