| To: | Iustin Pop <iusty@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raid 10 su, sw settings |
| From: | Brad Langhorst <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:54:04 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20071231214223.GB3679@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1199059239.13944.65.camel@up> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712311203220.23402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1199126586.3437.10.camel@up> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712311406190.1239@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071231201712.GA3679@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1199134501.3437.21.camel@up> <20071231214223.GB3679@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 22:42 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 03:55:01PM -0500, Brad Langhorst wrote: > > Any opinions on the partition layout? Did you go to special effort to > > layout your partitions on the stripe boundaries (actually i don't really > > understand this fully yet). > > So instead of the usual 255 heads, 63 cylinders fake geometry that is > not a multiple of anything, I setup 16h/16c geometry that gives a nice > power-of-two multiplier so all partitions *should* be aligned at a nice > multiple of any size you choose; fdisk -l on the drive reports units of > 128k. Sorry to be thick... i don't understand this. Do you configure the raid controller with these settings? or is this an fdisk option? thanks! brad |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: raid 10 su, sw settings, Iustin Pop |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: raid 10 su, sw settings, Iustin Pop |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: raid 10 su, sw settings, Iustin Pop |
| Next by Thread: | Re: raid 10 su, sw settings, Iustin Pop |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |