xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: raid 10 su, sw settings

To: Brad Langhorst <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: raid 10 su, sw settings
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:07:27 -0500 (EST)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1199126586.3437.10.camel@up>
References: <1199059239.13944.65.camel@up> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712311203220.23402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1199126586.3437.10.camel@up>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx


On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Brad Langhorst wrote:


On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 12:04 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:


Typical blocks/sec from iostat during large file movements is about
100M/s read and 80M/s write.


#1 What type of performance do you expect with a 4-disk raid10?

Are you saying that i should not expect more?
I expect about 70% better performance, since I think a single disk
should be able to do 100M/s. Maybe this is unreasonable?
A single disk may do 90MiB/s burst but not sustained for read or write, at least not cheap SATA disks and when you get toward the middle part of the disk the speed wil drop off significantly. 100MiB/s read and 80MiB/s write for RAID10 sounds about right to me. Maybe someone else on the list with a similar configuration can chime in with their benchmarks.



#2 You should be able to umount/mount with the new sizes, although I have
not tested it myself b/c I typically use sw raid here (sunit/etc is
optimized for sw raid).
I am able to do the remount, but it seems to have had no impact.
I don't know why but I see 3 possibilities:
- Perhaps because su/sw settings  don't matter very much.
- maybe it didn't take effect (rebooting this system is not a preferred
option)
- maybe it doesn't matter if the partition layout is not optimized.

Brad




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>