| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fedora 8.0.1 XFS Tune on HW RAID for Max Write Throughput? |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:37:14 +1100 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alex Madarasz <List.XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712161847110.5540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1197653927.3841.1226620089@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4764AB08.7040608@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20071216233127.GY4612@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712161847110.5540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:47:26PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > The mkfs.xfs defaults will be just fine for a HW raid device? If you get a mkfs.xfs from CVS. When barry releases an updated xfsprogs tarball the defaults from there will be as we've been talking about. You may still need to tweak sunit/swidth for hardware raid (depending on you config) but that is no different to now.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 974747 - PATCH: Cleanup various fid related bits, Vlad Apostolov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] stop updating inode->i_blocks, Vlad Apostolov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fedora 8.0.1 XFS Tune on HW RAID for Max Write Throughput?, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fedora 8.0.1 XFS Tune on HW RAID for Max Write Throughput?, Changliang Chen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |