xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fedora 8.0.1 XFS Tune on HW RAID for Max Write Throughput?

To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fedora 8.0.1 XFS Tune on HW RAID for Max Write Throughput?
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:47:26 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alex Madarasz <List.XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20071216233127.GY4612@xxxxxxx>
References: <1197653927.3841.1226620089@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4764AB08.7040608@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20071216233127.GY4612@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx


On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, David Chinner wrote:

On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 10:35:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Alex Madarasz wrote:
We're building a new Fedora 8.0.1 Linux system to stream data from a
250Msps ADC to disk, and want to start tuning the system configuration
for maximum XFS write performance.  To date, without any significant
effort at tuning our Fedora 7 dev system, we're seeing 250MBps write
with 8-bit samples and ~ 300MBps write with 16-bit samples. We want to
push the tuning as far as we can go with this architecture before we
start looking at other hardware options.  Looking at various other
tuning pages on the Web finds few that are interested in maxing out
sequential writes to very large arrays while using SAS HW RAID with big
fast SAS drives too.

...

XFS Tuning Options?

- HW RAID0:
  - Array/logical disk HW RAID stripe size?

At any rate you'll want to match xfs's geometry with the raid geometry.

  - Cache enabled (some reports that cache s/b turned off?)?

If it's battery-backed cache, leave it on, and disable barriers in xfs
(it's a mount option)

  - xfs mkfs / mount options?

David mentioned these before as a generic place to start:

# mkfs.xfs -f -l lazy-count=1,version=2,size=128m -i attr=2 -d agcount=4
<dev>
# mount -o logbsize=256k <dev> <mtpt>

and that those would be upcoming new defaults for mkfs.

4 ags may not be what you want for a ~2T filesystem.

Right - the 4 AG tuning is effectively for single disk configurations to
limit parallelism and therefore keep seeks between AGs down. When you
have multiple disks, the [new] mkfs defaults should be just fine (i.e.
just drop the agcount suggestion).

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group



Dave,

The mkfs.xfs defaults will be just fine for a HW raid device?

Justin.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>