| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] make inode reclaim synchronise with xfs_iflush_done() |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:29:40 +0000 |
| Cc: | xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <475F878D.6090407@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <475F878D.6090407@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 06:02:37PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> On a forced shutdown, xfs_finish_reclaim() will skip flushing the inode.
> If the inode flush lock is not already held and there is an outstanding
> xfs_iflush_done() then we might free the inode prematurely. By acquiring
> and releasing the flush lock we will synchronise with xfs_iflush_done().
Sound fine, but I think it would be nicer if we could keep the else if
formatting, ala:
/*
* We are not interested in doing an iflush if we're
* in the process of shutting down the filesystem forcibly.
* So, just reclaim the inode.
*/
} else if (locked) {
xfs_ifunlock(ip);
xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
} else {
/*
* If the flush lock is not already held then temporarily
* acquire it to synchronize with xfs_iflush_done.
*/
xfs_iflock(ip);
xfs_ifunlock(ip);
}
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 2/2] kill xfs_root, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] prevent panic during log recovery due to bogus operation header length, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] make inode reclaim synchronise with xfs_iflush_done(), Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] prevent panic during log recovery due to bogus operation header length, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |