|To:||Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: ACL limit|
|From:||Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 3 Dec 2007 01:12:19 +0100 (CET)|
|Cc:||David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|References:||<Pine.LNX.4.64.0711301902360.18767@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071202223105.GS119954183@xxxxxxx> <475343FB.3060902@xxxxxxx>|
On Dec 3 2007 10:47, Timothy Shimmin wrote: > > Yeah, it's just an array of entries in an EA value. > The EA value is limited to 64K so it's a question of how > many entries you can fit into that. > (64K - 4)/12 = 5461 > > (So just have to sort out the ondisk change as mentioned above) I'd already be happy if the ext3 ACL limit (~120) was possibe :-) The rest I can solve with groups (which is also probably faster than 1600 ACL entries).
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|