[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ACL limit

To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ACL limit
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 01:12:19 +0100 (CET)
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <475343FB.3060902@xxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711301902360.18767@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071202223105.GS119954183@xxxxxxx> <475343FB.3060902@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Dec 3 2007 10:47, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> Yeah, it's just an array of entries in an EA value.
> The EA value is limited to 64K so it's a question of how
> many entries you can fit into that.
> (64K - 4)/12 = 5461
> (So just have to sort out the ondisk change as mentioned above)

I'd already be happy if the ext3 ACL limit (~120) was possibe :-)
The rest I can solve with groups (which is also probably faster
than 1600 ACL entries).

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>