| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Issue with 2.6.23 and drbd 8.0.7 |
| From: | Laurent CARON <lcaron@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:04:52 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20071218122900.GK4396912@sgi.com> |
| References: | <20071217143655.chiehahh@trusted.lncsa.com> <20071217220354.GU4396912@sgi.com> <4766F58C.8040000@lncsa.com> <20071217233759.GB4396912@sgi.com> <47678124.80906@lncsa.com> <20071218122900.GK4396912@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071009) |
David Chinner wrote: > Yes, XFS will use more memory - XFS's inodes are substantially larger > in memory than for reiserfs and so will consume more memory for the > same number of cached inodes. Hi, As a temporary workaround (while finishing tests on the x64 system), is there a way to decrease the amount of cached inodes to avoid such "crashes" ? Thanks |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Installing grub onto a system with XFS root fs, Martin Steigerwald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs mknod regression, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Issue with 2.6.23 and drbd 8.0.7, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | xfs problem ?, sudheer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |