xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Default mount options (that suck less).

To: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Default mount options (that suck less).
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:10:49 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20071112022806.GB102580300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20071029075657.GA84369978@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071031233516.GB88034736@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071112022806.GB102580300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:06PM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote:
> No gnus is bad news ?
> 
> Shall I interpret the lack of comments as "everything is fine, just commit 
> the damn thing ?"

Lack of comments to what?

I haven't seen whatever patches you've sent which means wither you
didn't tag the email as "[PATCH N/M]..." or "[REVIEW]..." and I
didn't notice the attachments (nope, I see no patches in my archives
of this thread) or, more likely, a spam filter along the way ate
them.  If you get no answer you resend the patches with [PATCH,
RESEND] in the title....

Can you please resend all the patches you want reviewed as a patch
per email?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>