Re: Default mount options (that suck less).

xfs

To:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: Default mount options (that suck less).
From:	Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:28:06 +1100
In-reply-to:	<20071031233516.GB88034736@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20071029075657.GA84369978@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071031233516.GB88034736@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.1i

No gnus is bad news ?

Shall I interpret the lack of comments as "everything is fine, just commit the 
damn thing ?"

Cheers,
-- 
Niv

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Niv Sardi <= Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., David Chinner

Previous by Date:	Re: files getting truncated on xfs, David Chinner
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] bulkstat fixups, Lachlan McIlroy
Previous by Thread:	Re: [xfs-masters] [PATCH] fs/xfs: remove duplicated defines, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:	Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., David Chinner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]