| To: | Manoj Kumar Pradhan <manojkp80@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Deviation from XSDM in DM_EVENT_XXX |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Nov 2007 20:55:30 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <cce360c30711062032w11ec966fy52f4702c2fff61db@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <cce360c30711062032w11ec966fy52f4702c2fff61db@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:02:12AM +0530, Manoj Kumar Pradhan wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone tell me why XFS-DMAPI deviates in the enum DM_EVEN_XXX > from the standard? From the spec: (http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9657099/chap4.htm) " dm_eventtype_t REQUIREMENT This enumeration must contain at least the elements listed here. The DMAPI implementation may choose a different order for the elements. " So as long as we have the events defined, it doesn't matter what their value or order in the enum is. It's a very rubbery spec.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE 972756 - Implement fallocate., nscott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs crash, Cedric - Equinoxe Media |
| Previous by Thread: | Deviation from XSDM in DM_EVENT_XXX, Manoj Kumar Pradhan |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] XFS: Use kernel-supplied "roundup_pow_of_two" for simplicity., Robert P. J. Day |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |