| To: | Jay Sullivan <jpspgd@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_force_shutdown called from file fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:30:17 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <9489F071-7966-4230-9DAC-D783B6B9600A@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <06CCEA2EB1B80A4A937ED59005FA855101AED1BE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <472A87FA.7000804@xxxxxxxxxxx> <9489F071-7966-4230-9DAC-D783B6B9600A@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) |
Jay Sullivan wrote: > Good eye: it wasn't mountable, thus the -L flag. No recent > (unplanned) power outages. The machine and the array that holds the > disks are both on serious batteries/UPS and the array's cache > batteries are in good health. Did you have the xfs_repair output to see what it found? You might also grab the very latest xfsprogs (2.9.4) in case it's catching more cases. I hate it when people suggest running memtest86, but I might do that anyway. :) What controller are you using? If you say "areca" I might be on to something with some other bugs I've seen... -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_force_shutdown called from file fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, Jay Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 972753 - Fix inode allocation latency, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_force_shutdown called from file fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, Jay Sullivan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_force_shutdown called from file fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, Ralf Gross |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |