| To: | Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related) |
| From: | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:46:53 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20071127132000.GA31893@dose.home.local> |
| References: | <20071112064706.GA23595@dose.home.local> <200711262307.56742.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071127132000.GA31893@dose.home.local> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) |
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 23:07:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > [...] > > > On 2.6.23.1 you can test the freezer alone by doing > > > > # echo testproc > /sys/power/disk > > # echo disk > /sys/power/state > > This is suspend to RAM, not to disk. I know. :-) Nevertheless, this is how you can test the tasks freezer _without_ actually doing a suspend of any kind. Greetings, Rafael |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] Delayed logging of file sizes, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related), Rafael J. Wysocki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related), Rafael J. Wysocki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related), Rafael J. Wysocki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |