| To: | "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.24-rc2 XFS nfsd hang |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:02:41 +0000 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20071114175322.GD14254@fieldses.org> |
| References: | <20071114070400.GA25708@puku.stupidest.org> <20071114152952.GA4210@infradead.org> <20071114173922.GC14254@fieldses.org> <20071114174419.GA15271@infradead.org> <20071114175322.GD14254@fieldses.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:53:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:44:19PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > This must have come up before; feel free to remind me: is there any way > > > to make the interface easier to use? (E.g. would it help if the filldir > > > callback could be passed a dentry?) > > > > The best thing for the filesystem would be to have a readdirplus > > (or have it folded into readdir) instead of calling into lookup > > from ->filldir. > > And the readdirplus would pass a dentry to its equivalent of ->filldir? > Or something else? Personally I'd prefer it to only grow a struct stat or rather it's members But the nfsd code currently expects a dentry so this might require some major refactoring. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.24-rc2 XFS nfsd hang, J. Bruce Fields |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.24-rc2 XFS nfsd hang, J. Bruce Fields |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.24-rc2 XFS nfsd hang, J. Bruce Fields |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.24-rc2 XFS nfsd hang, J. Bruce Fields |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |