xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] add FIEMAP ioctl to efficiently map file allocation

To: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@xxxxxxxxx>, Mike Waychison <mikew@xxxxxxxxxx>, ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RFC] add FIEMAP ioctl to efficiently map file allocation
From: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:40:11 -0700
In-reply-to: <20071029222907.GF3042@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
References: <20070419015426.GM48531920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070430224401.GX5967@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070501042254.GD77450368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1FA8E92B-954D-4624-A089-80D4AA7399FD@xxxxxxxxx> <20070502000654.GK77450368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8464EA47-03AC-4162-A2D0-683517568640@xxxxxxxxx> <20071029194507.GA8578@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071029205744.GB28607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071029221302.GD3042@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071029222907.GF3042@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11)
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 04:29:07PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2007  16:13 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On Oct 29, 2007  13:57 -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> > > I'm a little bit confused by fe_offset. Is it a physical offset, or a
> > > logical offset? The reason I ask is that your description above says 
> > > "FIEMAP
> > > ioctl will return the logical to physical mapping for the extent that
> > > contains the specified logical byte address." Which seems to imply 
> > > physical,
> > > but your math to get to the next logical start in a very fragmented file,
> > > implies that fe_offset is a logical offset:
> > > 
> > >        fm_start = fm_extents[fm_extent_count - 1].fe_offset +
> > >                          fm_extents[fm_extent_count - 1].fe_length + 1; 
> > 
> > Note the distinction between "fe_offset" (which is a physical offset for
> > a single extent) and "fm_offset" (which is a logical offset for that file).
> 
> Actually, that is completely bunk.  What it should say is something like:
> "filefrag can easily call the FIEMAP ioctls repeatedly using the returned
> fm_start and fm_length as the start offset for the next ioctl:
> 
>         fiemap.fm_start = fiemap.fm_start + fiemap.fm_length + 1;

Yeah - that's where I was going with my question. This is much more clear
now, thanks.
        --Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>