| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less). |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:05:53 +1100 |
| Cc: | Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4725E84D.3030609@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20071029075657.GA84369978@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4725E84D.3030609@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:03:57AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Niv Sardi wrote: > > please submit your pet-idea for better defaults here. > > larger logbuf count/size seems to be the other tuning that's thrown > around a lot. Well, we already default to 8 logbufs, and 256k log buffers are not a win in a lot of situations. The log buffer size is a mount option, so it's much easier to tweak once we default to v2 logs... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] add FIEMAP ioctl to efficiently map file allocation, Andreas Dilger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Crash with XFS on top of DRBD (DRBD 8.0.6 svn / Kernel 2.6.22), David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |