| To: | Hannes Dorbath <light@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less). |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:07:30 -0500 |
| Cc: | Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4725F6C0.3020303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20071029075657.GA84369978@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4725E84D.3030609@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4725F6C0.3020303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) |
Hannes Dorbath wrote: > On 29.10.2007 15:03, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Niv Sardi wrote: >>> XFS's default mount options are in most cases sub-optimal, we should try >>> to have more sensible defaults, so far I'm following some quick dave-powered >>> recomendations: > > Is there any reason to not set the default inode size to 512 bytes? ..as > suggested in: > > http://www.suse.de/~agruen/acl/linux-acls/online/ attr2 should help with the problem now... unless there is some common case where attr2+256 still spills out a lot? -Eric |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Hannes Dorbath |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Hannes Dorbath |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Stewart Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |