| To: | Anton A Vorobev <anton.vorobev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18 |
| From: | Josef Sipek <jsipek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:37:06 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4717156C.3030308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4717156C.3030308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-07-16) |
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Anton A Vorobev wrote: > Hi! > > A question. We've got an application that runs about 30-40 minutes. After > kernel upgrade from 2.6.17 branch, it runs about 3 hours. > I've made tests with the help of bonnie++, it shows that random seek > operations are about 3 times slower in kernels newer than 2.6.18 in > comparison with 2.6.17. This difference may be seen only during high load > of a server. When it is in normal state, parameters are rather the same. I think that's about when the defaults for few /proc/sys/vm/ vars changed. One from 10 to 5, and another from 40 to 10. I forget the exact filenames. Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Once you have their hardware. Never give it back. (The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC 0/2] Case-insensitive filename lookup for XFS, Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC 0/2] Case-insensitive filename lookup for XFS, Barry Naujok |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: {WHAT?} Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18, Peter Grandi |
| Next by Thread: | raw vs XFS sequential write and system load, Mario Kadastik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |