xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: raw vs XFS sequential write and system load

To: Mario Kadastik <mario.kadastik@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: raw vs XFS sequential write and system load
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:23:57 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <B4D42128-E5B2-48B1-AEF1-586FD90AF605@xxxxxxx>
References: <B4D42128-E5B2-48B1-AEF1-586FD90AF605@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:50:44PM +0200, Mario Kadastik wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have a slight problem. Namely we have 4 systems with each having 2x  
> 3ware 9550SX cards in them each with hardware RAID5. Everything is  
> running the latest FW etc. The systems have at least 3GB of memory  
> and at least 2 CPU-s (one has 4GB and 4 cpu-s).

Before going any further, what kernel are you using and what's
the output of xfs_info </mntpt> of the filesytsem you are testing?

FWIW, high iowait = high load average. High iowait is generally an
indicator of an overloaded disk subsystem.  You tests to the raw
device only used a single stream, so it's unlikely to show any of
the issues you're complaining about when running tens of parallel
streams....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>