| To: | "Anton A Vorobev" <anton.vorobev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18 |
| From: | "Bhagi rathi" <jahnu77@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:45:05 +0530 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=/kaIt7ZlHbd1OyUCZ1c2Wynoi5Uc1bj4I7l7qv67b5E=; b=YKsFG0g6lUUH1klxKzzr5LY4MZbBmkuiPerHuKPxN55xvFMVF9rjCUa/dofHCN67FGdR1AHKxhbfvmUl3CdxbeNkoypydJ2uMr/grunrgsVChD/qeaLosc0A8cWC89zrbxRp7xWczRPXkGDbVM+ExfMLQvdf61fu4ur+QUxL6f0= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=T+xb39AVLma0cLP9QJDsKMFAu4ynAu8VlOCSDXLiDm7TyCKPTHPw8OWDMEjvrKZtvCwHcWvOP1+NdCTQDY4ccobpaSnzPQKOQ414pqAULMk7RrR0aoEVGMDk90gkh/Lyki/Z4BkWZveX+qM7BdsCExzkImMEE0QM/V3yrzQBrLE= |
| In-reply-to: | <4717156C.3030308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4717156C.3030308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Is it the same on ext file-systems? Can you run the same tests on disk devices directly to rule out scheduling issues of i/o requests by device drivers? One way I was thinking that we got a kind of cache pollution or invalidation thus exposing to do more seeks. Can you tell the equivalent file-system operations that your application in general do? This will give a lot of insight on what could be happening. -Bhagi. On 10/18/07, Anton A Vorobev <anton.vorobev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi! > > A question. We've got an application that runs about 30-40 minutes. > After kernel upgrade from 2.6.17 branch, it runs about 3 hours. > I've made tests with the help of bonnie++, it shows that random seek > operations are about 3 times slower in kernels newer than 2.6.18 in > comparison with 2.6.17. This difference may be seen only during high > load of a server. When it is in normal state, parameters are rather the > same. > > We use XFS filesystem. Does any one know may it be because of upgrade of > XFS driver in kernel? Any ideas? > > Thanks a lot. > > ______________________________________________________________ > Anton Vorobev > Programátor > Seznam.cz, a.s. Radlická 608/2 150 00 Praha 5 > > tel.: +420 234 694 706 > fax: +420 234 694 115 > anton.vorobev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.seznam.cz > > > > [[HTML alternate version deleted]] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18, Anton A Vorobev |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | raw vs XFS sequential write and system load, Mario Kadastik |
| Previous by Thread: | Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18, Anton A Vorobev |
| Next by Thread: | Re: {WHAT?} Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18, Peter Grandi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |