xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18

To: "Anton A Vorobev" <anton.vorobev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18
From: "Bhagi rathi" <jahnu77@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:45:05 +0530
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=/kaIt7ZlHbd1OyUCZ1c2Wynoi5Uc1bj4I7l7qv67b5E=; b=YKsFG0g6lUUH1klxKzzr5LY4MZbBmkuiPerHuKPxN55xvFMVF9rjCUa/dofHCN67FGdR1AHKxhbfvmUl3CdxbeNkoypydJ2uMr/grunrgsVChD/qeaLosc0A8cWC89zrbxRp7xWczRPXkGDbVM+ExfMLQvdf61fu4ur+QUxL6f0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=T+xb39AVLma0cLP9QJDsKMFAu4ynAu8VlOCSDXLiDm7TyCKPTHPw8OWDMEjvrKZtvCwHcWvOP1+NdCTQDY4ccobpaSnzPQKOQ414pqAULMk7RrR0aoEVGMDk90gkh/Lyki/Z4BkWZveX+qM7BdsCExzkImMEE0QM/V3yrzQBrLE=
In-reply-to: <4717156C.3030308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4717156C.3030308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Is it the same on ext file-systems?

Can you run the same tests on disk devices directly to rule out scheduling
issues of  i/o requests
by device drivers?  One way I was thinking that we got a kind of cache
pollution or invalidation
thus exposing to do more seeks.  Can you tell the equivalent file-system
operations that your
application in general do? This will give a lot of insight on what could be
happening.

-Bhagi.

On 10/18/07, Anton A Vorobev <anton.vorobev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> A question. We've got an application that runs about 30-40 minutes.
> After kernel upgrade from 2.6.17 branch, it runs about 3 hours.
> I've made tests with the help of bonnie++, it shows that random seek
> operations are about 3 times slower in kernels newer than 2.6.18 in
> comparison with 2.6.17. This difference may be seen only during high
> load of a server. When it is in normal state, parameters are rather the
> same.
>
> We use XFS filesystem. Does any one know may it be because of upgrade of
> XFS driver in kernel? Any ideas?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Anton Vorobev
> Programátor
> Seznam.cz, a.s. Radlická 608/2 150 00 Praha 5
>
> tel.: +420 234 694 706
> fax: +420 234 694 115
> anton.vorobev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seznam.cz
>
>
>
>


[[HTML alternate version deleted]]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>