| To: | Andrew Clayton <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Latencies in XFS. |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:49:23 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20071014012323.1d6c9e8e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <20071009163635.413dec0c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071013201015.4a8008bb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071014012323.1d6c9e8e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Le Sun, 14 Oct 2007 01:23:23 +0100 vous écriviez: > > I notice you use a bleeding-edge unstable kernel, with a whole new > > scheduler. I tried your benchmark on a machine running a known > > stable kernel (2.6.20.17) and the slowdown is similar in xfs and > > other fs. > > I don't see the slowdown in ext3. I tried it and the slowdown is proportionnally similar, though XFS is slower IO-wise. -- -------------------------------------------------- Emmanuel Florac www.intellique.com -------------------------------------------------- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Latencies in XFS., Peter Grandi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Repeated XFS Crash on x86_64 fiesty, Peter Grandi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Latencies in XFS., Andrew Clayton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Latencies in XFS., Peter Grandi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |