xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: running xfs_repair on large partitions

To: Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: running xfs_repair on large partitions
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:14:52 +0200
Cc: xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20071010143337.GA2815@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Moi.
References: <20071010143337.GA2815@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Le Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:33:38 +0200 vous écriviez:

> 1) it would be nice to have a way to know xfs_repair's version
> (-V ?), when using it from a rescue disk I'm never sure if I should
> get a newer one.

Did you try "xfs_repair -V" as you suggest? On my system, it replies
with the version...

> 2) on a 32bit system, using xfsprogs version 2.9.0 , it seems
> xfs_repair will fail if its process exceeds 4G. Is that right? Is
> there a way to circumvent that limitation?

No, this is precisely what 32 bits mean. A 32 bits process can't
address more than 2^32 bits, which is 4GB. However I'm
surprised you have this problem; I've xfs_repaired up to 16TB
filesystem (maximum manageable with a 32 bits kernel ) without such
problem.
-- 
Since we're all here, we must not be all there.
                -- Bob "Mountain" Beck


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>