| To: | Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS internal error |
| From: | Max Waterman <davidmaxwaterman+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:48:19 +0800 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <op.tzuxcgsi3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <470831E6.4030704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071008001452.GX995458@xxxxxxx> <47098DD4.4090207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <op.tzuxcgsi3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) |
Barry Naujok wrote: Yes, the latest xfs_repair doesn't create a lost+found unless it needs to, and if it does so, it will list the inodes moved there. So, in your case, nothing went to lost+found. Regards, Barry. Great. Thanks a lot for your help :) Max. PS. I'm still missing working at SGI :| |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS internal error, Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: Case-insensitive support for XFS, Barry Naujok |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS internal error, Barry Naujok |
| Next by Thread: | Content violation, adminmae |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |