xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mounting raid5 with different unit values

To: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mounting raid5 with different unit values
From: Raz <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:42:17 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=YnmGZb1CoFObg3EI2lYblfAYVRqv3T0UKjAq/8+TeWg=; b=huPajv6HImJ3gcI/OA0r7UogFUqDAOqn4sWrZJO/+/8+H7n5eJRI3X1TNLBi/dFtOkgk18UW9p8C2p9uFT1x8Qkd/0ThAOFiSR0uI1t9wzg0pvSps2UkmPvk5vVrh6iOzzoAMygm3Fvk+HbGfOKSZziikykXF+lX082HMTP36oI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ilC8RmX06+PgAd8JDmo6z3iJwVsSWlaGRpNQKa+kXKO2l0s0wJTMlXNmKipfoQfoY7JJWJKoGJ/96mIrhEyrMNPlC5e4nG9rTsIe5Dh5+fJDcTsP+7o471oalyz8kznf7RqyT7TQIbDJB7aLl2JLzjJnZ3F9FOPOK/jZjo7EUM8=
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710070416160.741@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5d96567b0710070015j723810aag20dc3e2866868684@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710070416160.741@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 10/7/07, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Raz wrote:
>
> > Hello
> > I am trying to mount xfs over raid5. I am trying to mount it with
> > different values than
> > the true ones. the mount fails with a general error of :
> > mount -osunit=6144,swidth=18432 /dev/md1 /d1/
> > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md1,
> >        or too many mounted file systems
> >
> > the true values are:
> > xfs_info /d1/
> > meta-data=/dev/md1               isize=256    agcount=32, agsize=5687296 
> > blks
> >          =                       sectsz=4096  attr=0
> > data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=181989888, imaxpct=25
> >          =                       sunit=256    swidth=768 blks, unwritten=1
> > naming   =version 2              bsize=4096
> > log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=2
> >          =                       sectsz=4096  sunit=1 blks
> > realtime =none                   extsz=3145728 blocks=0, rtextents=0
> >
> >
> > this same command did work on 2.6.15  while it failing on 2.6.17 .
> > why ?
> > --
> > Raz
> >
> >
>
> Good question but also be alert that 2.6.17-2.6.17.6 will/may corrupt your
> XFS filesystem due to a nasty bug.
>
> Justin.
>
I am using patched xfs ( the patch of 2.6.17.7)

-- 
Raz


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>