| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.23 - revert a commit |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:26:11 +1000 |
| Cc: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710030411250.3650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20071001072350.DF61C58C4C0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4700EE2A.1020304@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4701A1D0.5010709@xxxxxxx> <4701ED51.8050706@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710020442540.24427@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4702F517.3040502@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710030411250.3650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 04:11:50AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: > If one with was running 2.6.23-rc8 with XFS, does that mean we should run > xfs_repair on our filesystems after upgrading to -rc9? Only if you had unclean shutdowns while running 2.6.23-rc8. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] XFS bitops to Linux again, nscott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.23-rc9-git1 hang with XFS, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.23 - revert a commit, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.23 - revert a commit, Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |