| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Creation time in XFS |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:38:22 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20071002092509.GF995458@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200709302124.38164.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <470042DC.2040009@xxxxxxx> <p73ve9r6v3a.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071002092509.GF995458@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 07:25:10PM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > > I don't think it is at all currently: > > So what is the point? Forensic analysis? Windows wants it, so I guess they added when they had to bump the inode version anyway in preparation of a user interface for samba. We probably should do the same for XFS when bumping the inode version for the crcs. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.23 - revert a commit, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Replace XFS bit functions with Linux functions, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Creation time in XFS, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Creation time in XFS, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |