nscott@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Great. You're light years ahead of the rest of the cleanup brigade. :)
Hey, I resemble that remark! :)
(FWIW, I too first ran through xfsqa with both calculations in place,
and caused it to complain loudly if there was a mismatch. Not 100%
coverage, but I'm not trying to do this half-assed either...)
>> I did also some simple tests using the QA suite -- i believe a few logs
>> were recovered -- but not the full tests.
>
> From a quick look, tests 085, 086 and 087 are the ones I was thinking of
> yesterday.
>
>>> To be honest, this sounds like just code churn and risk
>>> introduction.
>> Ok I got the message. I retract the patch. Sorry for bothering you
>> with lowly cleanups.
>
> Hey, I like cleanup as much as the next guy (as long as the next guy isn't
> Eric,
> he just lives to clean ;)
If I do any real work I might lose my job ;-) </joke>
> - also always ignores userspace despite knowing
> better)
Nah, I just forget.
-Eric
|