xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.23 - revert a commit

from [Justin Piszcz] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.23 - revert a commit
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 06:59:57 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20071004002611.GB23367404@sgi.com>
References: <20071001072350.DF61C58C4C0A@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <4700EE2A.1020304@sandeen.net> <4701A1D0.5010709@sgi.com> <4701ED51.8050706@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710020442540.24427@p34.internal.lan> <4702F517.3040502@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710030411250.3650@p34.internal.lan> <20071004002611.GB23367404@sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 


On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, David Chinner wrote:

On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 04:11:50AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: 
If one with was running 2.6.23-rc8 with XFS, does that mean we should run
xfs_repair on our filesystems after upgrading to -rc9?


Only if you had unclean shutdowns while running 2.6.23-rc8.

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group



K, thanks.

Justin.


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  selected., romandajason
Next by Date:  selected., romandajason
Previous by Thread:  Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.23 - revert a commit, David Chinner
Next by Thread:  Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.23 - revert a commit, David Chinner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]