Donald Douwsma wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 07:25:09AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> So, what's to be done about xfs_refcache.c... right now it's 2.4-only,
>>> but i'm not convinced that there is similar generic nfs functionality in
>>> 2.6, anyone know for sure?
>> We keep the inodes around through nfsd, yes. There's a slight problem
>> with ->release beeing called to early, but Greg is working on fixing
>> that using an open files cache in nfsd.
> Cool I'll keep that in mind,
> I'm going to remove support/Makefile which is 2.4 specific as well.
> Are there any other 2.4 isms you guys know of?
It may be worth diffing the linux-2.4/* and linux-2.6/* to see if there are
any no-ops in 2.6 there only for 2.4... I believe there are.
linux-2.6/mutex.h could probably go away...
hm, there are quite a few 2 or 3 line headers in there, dunno if it makes sense
to have them split out... maybe.
you could lose HAVE_SPLICE and HAVE_FOP_OPEN_EXEC I think
Hmm I wonder if custom do_div is still needed.