xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [UNSURE] Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large f

To: Ralf Gross <Ralf-Lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [UNSURE] Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files)
From: "Bryan J. Smith" <thebs413@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=HBtdVvutl5ZrT112+5a44TKKEkdizsZEsP3oX6e/3JQ26fX2EKYRbRVKRtx9KMroaK78rMzTS2T4DKam7C3QfVjA2/osAtAeQYaqFxSHUimwhsaZmT47Puued6lfe9HReMigGwXhoaAncES8fN8nSf1Y3uO56n/epnHprSJn22c=;
In-reply-to: <20070926165412.GE30287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Ralf Gross <Ralf-Lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Still 170-200 MB/s. The command above just tunes the read ahead
> value.

Don't expect your commits to an external subsystem to be anywhere
near as fast as software RAID in simple disk benchmarks.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith   Professional, Technical Annoyance
b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx    http://thebs413.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------
     Fission Power:  An Inconvenient Solution


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>