xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files)

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files)
From: Ralf Gross <Ralf-Lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:15:34 +0200
In-reply-to: <1254510454-1190819012-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1744849406-@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709260549250.4769@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1254510454-1190819012-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1744849406-@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Bryan J Smith schrieb:
> Everyone can play local benchmarking games all they want,
> and software RAID will almost always be faster, significantly at times.
> 
> What matters is actual, multiple client performance under full load.
> Anything less is a completely irrelevant.

You're right, but these benchmarks help to find simple failures or
misconfigurations at an earlier stage of the process.

Ralf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>