xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] Restore ihashsize mount option as deprecated

To: markgw@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] Restore ihashsize mount option as deprecated
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:38:02 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, trev <trev@xxxxxxx>, "Kevin G. Snow" <kgsnow@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <46F6E344.20907@xxxxxxx>
References: <20070809114548.GG12413810@xxxxxxx> <46F4390A.5070407@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070923075756.GP995458@xxxxxxx> <20070923100039.GA5370@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46F67BD3.8050706@xxxxxxxxxxx> <46F6E344.20907@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
Mark Goodwin wrote:
> 
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Did anyone but Dave get Eric's original message?  It seems to not have
>>> made it to the list.
>>>
>> No, it was yet another lost email on oss.  I guess the xfs-dev list got it.
>>
>> >From a fairly quick look at logs I have no idea what happened... but
>> this is clearly a problem that must be solved one way or another.
> 
> Have we (or can we) agree on a new list handler? The current mechanism
> has trouble allowing new subscribers 

That appeared to be spamfilter misfires.

> and now we see it's loosing mail
> too. 

Not sure anyone has gotten to the bottom of this new problem.

-Eric

> Let's get this fixed and move on. Who owns this on oss? If nobody,
> then I'll organize it, but first we need consensus on a replacement.
> 
> Thanks
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>