Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE

xfs

Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK

To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:29:27 -0500
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20070919202239.GA32475@xxxxxx>
References:	<20070919161202.GA18130@xxxxxx> <46F16752.1090702@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070919202239.GA32475@xxxxxx>
Sender:	xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530)

Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> 
>> HAVE_SPLICE
> 
> 
> Backward compat?

ah, yeah, it's for 2.4:

0 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h <global>  104 #define HAVE_SPLICE
1 fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c     <global> 4718 #ifdef HAVE_SPLICE

can probably go soon eh.  HAVE_PERCPU_SB can too (not sure why it's not
in my list)  There may be others that are just for 2.4.

> 
>> nested_spinlock
>> nested_spinunlock
> 
> don't your patches kill these?

yeah, I just checked pristine cvs.

-Eric

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK, Eric Sandeen <= Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK, nscott Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK, Christoph Hellwig

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK, nscott
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK, nscott
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]