On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:10:32PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > BTW, what problem led you to running xfs_repair in the first
> > place (i.e. what led to lost+found getting populated)?
>
> The infamous 2.6.17.1 corruption.
Well, that explains it ;)
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2
"To add insult to injury, xfs_repair(8) is currently not correcting
these directories on detection of this corrupt state either. This
xfs_repair issue is actively being worked on, and a fixed version
will be available shortly.
Update: a fixed xfs_repair is now available; version 2.8.10 or later
of the xfsprogs package contains the fixed version."
What version of xfs_repair are you using? (xfs_repair -V)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
|