| To: | "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: compression |
| From: | "Jordan Mendler" <jmendler@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:05:48 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=2/L2DdfX1jYXcMLtyiAAh6fwt2aX/8RH0BeTICBz0TA=; b=W9KLtZOnZvzbS8dD7f73Xlr30wcmPddgRwF44Dx9GN8mw+MIL+sIX29yrO8COVAR9eLvLhKfS/lrGTs5fbI90eIGKkGoWxO7MpUDwIVsoj5mwZv7686k1IxOJ9dyJoJ4g3tfll68/PaFMQjC/ZOPudakqnnru+zvCG7TQOJSk10= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=p9wUQSPWxjvQvVSpsLRd7Rg/549OPQukkduNA7qcvKpR5BgDhm1Wi6fsuGw0fACThCpin/ppLh9f9809y9005B3I9ubhL/oOAq6NheoQNzOVF/HaE5/B6tLxlzjlu13Kj+DpZLNFGHSoesDiDXs2BRwGdB7NoW6fVnxJwwSJHjg= |
| In-reply-to: | <46E74368.5090503@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <654e62180709111643k4700c2bdibec2a16eb5446e76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46E74368.5090503@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Do you know if there any plans to implement compression any time in the somewhat near future? Thanks, Jordan On 9/11/07, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jordan Mendler wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I searched the mailing list archive and could not find an answer. We are > > currently using XFS on Linux for a 17TB Volume used for backups. We are > > running out of space, so rather than order another array, I would like > to > > try to implement filesystem-level compression. Does XFS support any type > of > > compression? If not, are there any other ways to optimize for more space > > storage? We are doing extensive rsyncs as our method of backups, so > gzipping > > on top of the filesystem is not really an option. > > > > Thanks so much, > > Jordan > > > > No native compression in xfs... and it's not got a lot of space > overhead, to start with. > > If you're keeping multiple copies of things via complete nightly rsync > backups, there are mechanisms that just symlink files which haven't > changed... Or, have you looked into incremental backups via xfsdump? > Dunno if any of that helps, or if you've already thought of such > things. :) > > -Eric > [[HTML alternate version deleted]] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH SERIES] untangle spinlock macros, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: compression, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: compression, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: compression, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |