| To: | Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Attempt to Access Beyond End of Device |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:28:52 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Alec Joseph Rivera <agi@xxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1189439689.18040.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1189432747.4385.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46E5670E.9000703@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1189439689.18040.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) |
Federico Sevilla III wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 10:47 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> can you send along the results of: >> >> # xfs_db -r -c "sb 0" -c "print" /dev/sda8? > > Will do first thing tomorrow when I get back access to the machine, and > will revert to the list. > >> and >> # cat /proc/partitions >> >> ... and does the hardware raid have a funky sector size? > > Please advise as to how best to usually find this out. Dunno :) FWIW, the size check that is failing is simply looking at the fs geometry and trying to go out and read the last sector. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Attempt to Access Beyond End of Device, Federico Sevilla III |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Attempt to Access Beyond End of Device, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Attempt to Access Beyond End of Device, Federico Sevilla III |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Attempt to Access Beyond End of Device, Federico Sevilla III |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |