xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Not able to register

To: Luca Olivetti <luca@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Not able to register
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:41:33 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <46E508E6.7010908@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cc7060690709072303x74e54d3fk3260c93990707477@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46E3471D.7020408@xxxxxxxxxxx> <46E35C28.4060301@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070909065143.GA6787@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46E409F1.4090001@xxxxxxxxx> <68c491a60709090910t3bd37e7bxfec773f58a55224d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46E4A916.1010602@xxxxxxxxxxx> <46E508E6.7010908@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
Luca Olivetti wrote:
> En/na Eric Sandeen ha escrit:
>> Martin Schröder wrote:
>>> 2007/9/9, Michael Nishimoto <miken@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> In the past when I spoke with Russell, gmail subscribes
>>>> look like spam to the ecartis server.
>>> Then ecartis is broken. Since it seems very stale (last released
>>> version is from 2000, since then only snapshots), maybe you should
>>> switch to something more vital? Mailman comes to mind...
>>>
>>> Best
>>>    Martin
>>>
>>>
>> Ok, in Luca's case at least, it was spamassassin intercepting it...
>> thought his subscribe request looked like spam.  :(  Looks like
>> something to sort out, eh.
> 
> Well, using bogus black lists (aren't they all bogus?) leads to that 
> (hint: my ip address isn't dynamic, though I strongly disagree to use 
> that as a criterion to decide what I'm allowed to do or not with my 
> connection).

it wasn't a blacklist, it was about 4 other tests that tripped.

> Though I find it funny that in a misguided attempt to block spam I 
> cannot subscribe to the list, still I can post to it :-D
> 
>> Hm, Luca and about 130 others, from grepping the logs.
> 
> qed

no argument.

I'm sure this is fixable... sorry about the problems.

-Eric

> Bye
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>