[Top] [All Lists]

Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes
From: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 20:55:19 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <5d96567b0709030724w3098395bnbd511fa3819e5b22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5d96567b0707160542t2144c382mbfe3da92f0990694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5d96567b0707160653m5951fac9v5a56bb4c92174d63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070716221831.GE31489@xxxxxxx> <18076.1449.138328.66699@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070717001205.GI31489@xxxxxxx> <18076.4940.845633.149160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070717005854.GL31489@xxxxxxx> <5d96567b0707222309y61480271xa8220a0b179764e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070724010105.GN31489@xxxxxxx> <5d96567b0708070220u23c895ffk54849fca947b5100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5d96567b0709030724w3098395bnbd511fa3819e5b22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Raz wrote:
What is the curret status of this problem ? If you recall , xfs in 32bit
over 10 TB md device ( raid50 in this case) sees only 8TB ( and no more).
The disks I am using are 750GB hitachi.
kernel is 2.6.17.

dunno about this particular issue, but you meant "kernel or higher", right? If not: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2

BOFH excuse #374:

It's the InterNIC's fault.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>