xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes

To: "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes
From: Raz <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 17:24:21 +0300
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aTi30IJKh0YgT+ExNbBZoaMsVt9qejvbMeGj8m9YhicBJinRnUwfhOUfKLr71GSdJY/qJDGMOzPWEARlJZtvWXwZUNMSWK/pngB4VntwIol7yYhP8LlllaiCNAdw4GvH/yWxkMMO4JgOlJv7/cyGtjclqBRahDm9wZH4muPad80=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MKjkRmTzyAV7qIuNyZ6qGyAdazdIkEUvDo+5UFB+2g8lvSzLgGDNgOmOfPSccM5lA3gQvgRtSjClxEiZo3Rc4UoCeLVFvJcfpke8QSMvi8XG+uv6L6cf78Sb4rJPDRjctcWSojNqT+0HndKeUZ5/9+C27sXsCCo35cAUmCqmCrU=
In-reply-to: <5d96567b0708070220u23c895ffk54849fca947b5100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5d96567b0707160542t2144c382mbfe3da92f0990694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5d96567b0707160653m5951fac9v5a56bb4c92174d63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070716221831.GE31489@xxxxxxx> <18076.1449.138328.66699@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070717001205.GI31489@xxxxxxx> <18076.4940.845633.149160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070717005854.GL31489@xxxxxxx> <5d96567b0707222309y61480271xa8220a0b179764e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070724010105.GN31489@xxxxxxx> <5d96567b0708070220u23c895ffk54849fca947b5100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dave hello.
What is the curret status of this problem ? If you recall , xfs in 32bit
over 10 TB md device ( raid50 in this case) sees only 8TB ( and no more).
The disks I am using are 750GB hitachi.
kernel is 2.6.17.

thank you
raz


On 8/7/07, Raz <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/24/07, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:09:03AM +0300, Raz wrote:
> > > My QA to re-installed the system. same kernel, different results. now,
> > > /proc/paritions
> > > reports :
> > >   9     1 5114281984 md1
> > >   9     2 5128001536 md2
> > >   9     3 10242281472 md3
> > >
> > > blockdev --getsize64 /dev/md3
> > > 10488096227328
> > >
> > > but xfs keeps on crashing. when formatting it ot 6.3 TB we're OK. when
> > > letting xfs's mkfs choose the
> >
> > So at 6.3TB everything is ok. At what point does it start having
> > problems? 6.4TB, 6.8TB, 8TB, 9TB?
> over 8 TB. we checked several times. in 8.5 it crashes.
> > I know Neil pointed out that you shouldn't have 10TB but closer to
> > 7TB - is this true?
> the drives are of 750 GB each.
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dave.
> > --
> > Dave Chinner
> > Principal Engineer
> > SGI Australian Software Group
> >
>
>
> --
> Raz
>


-- 
Raz


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>