| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] log replay should not overwrite newer ondisk inodes |
| From: | Vlad Apostolov <vapo@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 03 Sep 2007 08:50:51 +1000 |
| Cc: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20070831154822.GD734179@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <46D6279F.40601@xxxxxxx> <46D6480F.4040307@xxxxxxx> <46D64CAD.6050705@xxxxxxx> <46D67FE6.20205@xxxxxxx> <46D68510.1020404@xxxxxxx> <46D77B79.3040104@xxxxxxx> <46D792A1.7030308@xxxxxxx> <20070831154822.GD734179@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) |
David Chinner wrote: An unlinked inode is only detectable by the mode parameter being zero. The rest of the inode will look valid. What about the nlink count? Can't we detect unlinked inode by nlink == 0? Regards, Vlad |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] kill probe_* sysctl leftovers, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 compared, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] kill probe_* sysctl leftovers, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] log replay should not overwrite newer ondisk inodes, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |