[Top] [All Lists]

Re: state of the cvs tree

To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: state of the cvs tree
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:54:43 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070913234829.GW734179@sgi.com>
References: <20070912121938.GA16870@lst.de> <46E870AB.30906@sgi.com> <20070913104000.GB3351@lst.de> <20070913234829.GW734179@sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (Macintosh/20070728)
David Chinner wrote:

>> Then I have a patch from Eric sitting in the front of my queue,
>>      "[PATCH V2] refactor xfs_mountfs for clarity & stack savings"
>> which might be a little too big for 2.6.24, but should at least go into
>> CVS ASAP.  I think Eric would be really happy to see it in 2.6.24 aswell
>> because that means FC8 could actually mount xfs out of the box without
>> running out of stack or something.
> Yeah, that's been floating about for a bit and has been tested in
> FC8 so seems like a no-brainer for .24.

you're assuming anyone besides me tested xfs in F8TestX... *grin*

(F8Test2 was released today... hint hint...)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>