[Top] [All Lists]

Re: state of the cvs tree

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: state of the cvs tree
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:50:31 -0500
Cc: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070913104000.GB3351@lst.de>
References: <20070912121938.GA16870@lst.de> <46E870AB.30906@sgi.com> <20070913104000.GB3351@lst.de>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20070530)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> Then I have a patch from Eric sitting in the front of my queue,
>       "[PATCH V2] refactor xfs_mountfs for clarity & stack savings"
> which might be a little too big for 2.6.24, but should at least go into
> CVS ASAP.  I think Eric would be really happy to see it in 2.6.24 aswell
> because that means FC8 could actually mount xfs out of the box without
> running out of stack or something.

Yes ;-)  I've got that patch in Fedora now, but it'd be great to have it
come via upstream.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>