| To: | Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH SERIES] untangle spinlock macros |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:04:29 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <46E7460D.3000502@sgi.com> |
| References: | <46E6221E.803@sandeen.net> <46E7460D.3000502@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) |
Donald Douwsma wrote: > But here you use the name of the lock variable. > > /* > - * We actually don't have to acquire the SB_LOCK at all. > + * We actually don't have to acquire the m_sb_lock at all. > * This can only be called from mount, and that's single threaded. > XXX > */ I was going to change this, but "sb lock" sounds way too generic to me... -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH SERIES] untangle spinlock macros, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 968767 - Ensure file size updates have been completed before writing inode to disk., Lachlan McIlroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH SERIES] untangle spinlock macros, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | compression, Jordan Mendler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |