| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes |
| From: | Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Sep 2007 20:55:19 +0200 (CEST) |
| In-reply-to: | <5d96567b0709030724w3098395bnbd511fa3819e5b22@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <5d96567b0707160542t2144c382mbfe3da92f0990694@mail.gmail.com> <5d96567b0707160653m5951fac9v5a56bb4c92174d63@mail.gmail.com> <20070716221831.GE31489@sgi.com> <18076.1449.138328.66699@notabene.brown> <20070717001205.GI31489@sgi.com> <18076.4940.845633.149160@notabene.brown> <20070717005854.GL31489@sgi.com> <5d96567b0707222309y61480271xa8220a0b179764e0@mail.gmail.com> <20070724010105.GN31489@sgi.com> <5d96567b0708070220u23c895ffk54849fca947b5100@mail.gmail.com> <5d96567b0709030724w3098395bnbd511fa3819e5b22@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Raz wrote:
What is the curret status of this problem ? If you recall , xfs in 32bit over 10 TB md device ( raid50 in this case) sees only 8TB ( and no more). The disks I am using are 750GB hitachi. kernel is 2.6.17. dunno about this particular issue, but you meant "kernel 2.6.17.7 or higher", right? If not: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2 -- BOFH excuse #374: It's the InterNIC's fault. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes, Raz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: lockdep annotations?, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes, Raz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |