xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: About errors in XFS header files and xfsprogs

To: Martin Schröder <martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: About errors in XFS header files and xfsprogs
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:12:05 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <68c491a60708301539t2d386c88n907de44cf1ed743b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Aconex
References: <46D6F066.5000009@xxxxx> <20070830165556.GA13308@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <68c491a60708301539t2d386c88n907de44cf1ed743b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 00:39 +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2007/8/30, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 06:29:26PM +0200, Bogdan wrote:
> > >                                The header files should not only be
> > > ISO-C-compatible, but even ANSI-C-compatible. This will allow
> anyone
> > > to use them.
> >
> > Sais who?  The GNU C extensions are very useful for programming, and
> > there is no reason to move to an inferior dialect.
> 
> Do you want to limit xfs to gcc/Linux? Other Unices may use other ccs.
> 

These headers compile just fine on IRIX, FreeBSD and MacOSX ... the
gcc-specific pieces are in platform dependent headers already.

cheers.

--
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>