xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

PARTIAL TAKE 968563 - growlock should be a mutex

To: sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: PARTIAL TAKE 968563 - growlock should be a mutex
From: dgc@xxxxxxx (David Chinner)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:46:01 +1000 (EST)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
growlock should be a mutex

m_growlock only needs plain binary mutex semantics, so use a struct
mutex instead of a semaphore for it.


Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>


Date:  Fri Aug 24 23:45:37 AEST 2007
Workarea:  chook.melbourne.sgi.com:/build/dgc/isms/2.6.x-xfs
Inspected by:  hch@xxxxxx

The following file(s) were checked into:
  longdrop.melbourne.sgi.com:/isms/linux/2.6.x-xfs-melb


Modid:  xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:29512a
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h - 1.250 - changed
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/xfs_mount.h.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.250&r2=text&tr2=1.249&f=h
        - convert m_growlock to a mutex.

fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c - 1.409 - changed
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/xfs_mount.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.409&r2=text&tr2=1.408&f=h
        - convert m_growlock to a mutex.

fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c - 1.130 - changed
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/xfs_fsops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.130&r2=text&tr2=1.129&f=h
        - convert m_growlock to a mutex.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • PARTIAL TAKE 968563 - growlock should be a mutex, David Chinner <=