xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Impact of atime updates on XFS

To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Impact of atime updates on XFS
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 20:15:44 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200708090820.55509.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200708081408.01817.ms@xxxxxxxxx> <20070808235904.GS52011508@xxxxxxx> <200708090820.55509.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:20:55AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 schrieb David Chinner:
> 
> > > What would be the impact of atime versus noatime on XFS? What is the
> > > recommended setting for XFS? Are there any plans to implement
> > > relatime logic - maybe even the improved one by Ingo Molnar - into
> > > XFS?
> >
> > relatime is a VFS layer construct - it should work with XFS right now.
> 
> Thanks for your answer.
> 
> XFS says:
> 
> XFS: unknown mount option [relatime].

That's because it's supposed to be encoded in the mount flags (i.e.
intercepted by the mount binary and not passed to the kernel
directly). I think you need a more recent mount binary....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>