| To: | Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Impact of atime updates on XFS |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Aug 2007 20:15:44 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200708090820.55509.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200708081408.01817.ms@xxxxxxxxx> <20070808235904.GS52011508@xxxxxxx> <200708090820.55509.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:20:55AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 schrieb David Chinner: > > > > What would be the impact of atime versus noatime on XFS? What is the > > > recommended setting for XFS? Are there any plans to implement > > > relatime logic - maybe even the improved one by Ingo Molnar - into > > > XFS? > > > > relatime is a VFS layer construct - it should work with XFS right now. > > Thanks for your answer. > > XFS says: > > XFS: unknown mount option [relatime]. That's because it's supposed to be encoded in the mount flags (i.e. intercepted by the mount binary and not passed to the kernel directly). I think you need a more recent mount binary.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Impact of atime updates on XFS, Martin Steigerwald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS thread inflation in 2.6.23rc, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Impact of atime updates on XFS, Martin Steigerwald |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Impact of atime updates on XFS, Martin Steigerwald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |